There was a general increase in transport fares across different modes of transportation in the country in December 2022. The report on transport fares released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) in January 2023 revealed that the average fare paid by passengers for bus journey within the city per drop increased from N637.10 in November 2022 to N644.66 in December 2022, representing a 1.19% increase on a month-on-month basis.
Ever wondered why some countries win medals while others do not? Neither do they have the ability to win medals if they participate in sports event such as the Olympics? In developing countries, there are a number of economic concerns regarding sports. Arguments are made that a country’s performance in sports (Olympics) is relative to its economic resources, and that achievements in sport should be measured in terms of a country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita and investment in sport.
A well-organized sport development structure and a high level of funding can propel a country to the top of the medal table. Population is likewise salient, and with 1.4 billion people, China was well represented at the 2020 Olympic medal table, with a total of 88 medals won, trailing only the United States of America which had 113 medals won, a country with more than 300 million people.
Stylized facts on Sport and Economic Development
The three strongest markers of sports development in any economy are the degree of investment, the extent of population participation, and the level of political stability that exists. High investment correlates positively with buoyant economy, which has a knock-on effect on the amount of leisure time utilized. With more leisure hours, a larger proportion of the population can indulge in sports. Developed economies make significant investments in sport facilities, coaching skills, and sports science support programs, all of which are essential for sport sustainability. Sport investment can be an effective stimulus for developing the quality and quantity of sporting activities especially at the international level.
Figure 1 shows a positive correlation existing between political stability and the 2020 Olympic medal table. There is a clear disparity in the number of medals won between countries with stable political systems and those battling political instability.
Figure 1: Political Stability and 2020 Olympics Medal Won
Source: World Governance Indicators 2020 & International Olympic Committee 2021
Figure 2: Population and 2020 Olympics Medal Won
Source: Worldometers 2021 & International Olympic Committee 2021
Figure 2 also shows that population matter for the number of medals won. However, we note that this is secondary, as countries like New Zealand and Australia do well in the Olympics despite their relatively smaller population. Large population size, on the other hand, is not a sufficient prerequisite for sport development. Figure 2 however supports the hypothesis that the larger the population, the more athletes with different physical qualities and skills.
Another notable factor is investment, investment in sport clearly plays an important role in some athletic activities than in others. Games like rowing, cycling, golf, shooting, sailing and equestrian require exclusive equipment and amenities; Nigeria have never won medals at any of these sports. Even in less expensive sports, there is a huge inequality in access to coaching and training facilities. A survey in developing countries by UNESCO in 1995, referred to in Manzenreiter (2007), found that 16 of the least developed countries had an average of just 71 football pitches, 31 volleyball courts, 13 athletics tracks and 3 swimming pools per country. In recent times, the African continent has in total, 141 constructed Soccer stadiums and about 78 volleyball courts. The combination effect of investment in sport and human capital, political stability, and high population participation rate are necessary and sufficient for sport development.
Nigeria and Olympics
Nigeria officially competed in the Olympic Games in Helsinki 1952 and has since sent representatives to every Summer Olympic Games, apart from the 1976 Summer Olympics, which was boycotted. Nigeria has won 27 Olympic medals in total, including 3 gold, 10 silver and 14 bronze. The majority of the medals come in athletics and boxing. Nigeria achieved her finest result to date in the 1996 Atlanta Olympics, when the Dream Team football team were decorated with gold and Chioma Ajunwa won gold in the athletics division. Nigeria’s second best performance was in the 2008 Beijing Olympics where the men’s football team won a silver medal and Blessing Okagbare, an athlete won a silver medal.
Figure 3: Nigeria’s Olympics Performance
Since then, Nigeria's games have been on a downhill spiral. Lamentably, neither the men's nor women's football teams qualified for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, which was compounded by the disqualification of ten athletes.
Socio-economic benefits of Sport
Sports impact on the Nigerian economy may be evaluated in terms of its contribution to GDP, employment, and the indirect multiplier effect on improving public health, reducing crime rates, and supporting other sectors.
Sport is now a significant aspect of vast entrepreneurial activities, providing on the one hand, job creation for many in the various components of sport, and on the other hand, income and revenues to individuals and governments respectively. Currently, assessing the impact of sport on Nigeria's GDP is challenging because sport is not one of the key sectors considered by statisticians when estimating GDP. However, the sector is computed as part of the entertainment and recreation sector, which contributed 0.19, 0.31, and 0.33 percent to the Nigerian GDP in 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively. Sport contribution remains below one percent due to inadequate finance and investment.
Sport also helps to improve fundamental social and interpersonal skills, which aids in crime reduction and building national unity. Football tournaments, for instance, are regarded as one of the few events in Nigeria that have fostered a sense of national cohesion among the country’s heterogeneous population. In addition, sport provides an important platform for youths to develop life skills that will enable them to cope better with everyday life challenges and transition away from drug abuse, violence, and crime. Sport can be utilized as a medium to advocate for sustainable human rights, such as the right to social security and equality across gender and race.
Strategies to support sport development in Nigeria
Clearly, finance is the major constraint to sport development in Nigeria. There is a need to support national sporting bodies to implement targeted fund-raising programs and prioritize the allocation of resources for sport.
Furthermore, the Nigerian government should strive to implement a comprehensive sports policy that includes encouraging participation in all sporting activities in primary, secondary, and tertiary educational institutions as well as promoting local sports development. There is a need to boost private investors' confidence in the industry so they can fully participate in the business aspect of sports. These will help make the sports sector more appealing for the youth to pursue as a career and profitable for businesses.
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) recently announced a ban on the importation of maize/corn1. This ban adds maize to the list of 41 other products some of which include rice, cement, margarine, and palm kernel that had earlier been banned2. The embargo comes as a means to further encourage local production, stimulate economic growth as well as secure local jobs and livelihoods. Available data shows that Nigeria imported 400,000 tons of maize in 2019 the same as it did in 20183. However, forex restrictions on the importation of rice, coupled with the closure of the Nigerian land borders to neighboring countries, has seen the country move from a major importer to the largest producer of rice in Africa.4 By extension, it is expected that the addition of maize to the forex restriction list will help to stimulate its domestic production and thus reduce or eliminate dependence on imported maize. Consequently, this effort is also expected to limit domestic demand for forex and curb the exchange rate volatility.
According to the Debt Management Office (DMO), the outstanding public debt declined by 5.65 percent from $84 billion to $79.3 billion between December 2019 and March 20201. The reduction was driven by a 9 percent decline in domestic debt from $56.4 billion to $51.6 billion during the same period2. Meanwhile, the change to external debt was minimal as it tapered around $27.6 billion in both periods. While the decline in domestic debt is as a result of the redemption of Nigeria Treasury Bills (NTBs), the stagnation of external debt stems from the government’s need to limit its exposure to exchange rate volatility. However, the $3.4 billion in emergency support received from the IMF in April as well as the reliance on domestic debt to mitigate the impact of the pandemic will increase public debt in the near term. In this context, effective debt management is important not only with regards to the terms of borrowing but also in debt use and transparency.
Digital technologies have proven to be a crucial factor in the fight against covid-19, and response strategies to reduce the social and economic impacts of the pandemic. With the restriction in human interaction and closure of international borders to curtail the spread of the virus, usage and reliance on digital platforms has become the only medium of human interaction and economic transaction to mitigate and minimize the disruptive effect from the covid-19 virus. While the scope and scale of digital usage varies across countries based on extent of digitalization, some form of adoption of digital systems are witnessed in every country, including Sub-Saharan Africa countries with the lowest internet connection.
Like every other part of the world, digital economy plays four critical roles in response to COVID-19: surveillance, sensitization, social welfare intervention and substitution. These are couched as 4Ss as discussed below:
Weaknesses and gaps in Africa’s digital economy exposed
While the renewed importance of the digital economy offers opportunities for Africa, it however has its downside. The level of misinformation spread through social networks has been alarming, and difficult to curb, thereby posing a real problem to governments and health officials across the region during this period. The effect of such cases of false news has been far-reaching, creating public distrust and making some citizens doubt the severity of the virus, while some others have erroneously consumed harmful products touted as cures for covid-19.
In addition, the transition to dependence on digital technologies threatens to cause further exclusion as not all citizens are able to leverage digital alternatives in combating the impact of the pandemic. There are reported cases across the region of uneven access to digital services for educational needs, business operations, and so on. A number of factors are responsible for the digital gap within the continent:
The above constraints have ripple discriminatory effects on daily life, schooling options, means of livelihood for micro and small businesses, access to welfare funds, and so on. For instance, it could worsen pre-existing inequalities in the region’s educational systems, as vulnerable students in public schools are more likely to experience difficulty in accessing digital learning due to lack of digital infrastructure, broadband connectivity and digitalized teaching content.
Urgent need for data governance and greater inclusion
Data gathering and information sharing continues to be an indispensable part of research to curb the spread of the virus, monitor its impact and finding preventive or curative medicine. However, with more data flying across the web, the risks of data breaches and human rights violations have become more visible. In the months following the lockdown, there have been several reports in various African countries on dangers of digitalization in relation to hacking, financial fraud, disinformation, exploitation of youths, among others. Even before the pandemic started, the African Union had estimated an annual loss of $3.5billion from cybercrimes across the continent. Although free flow of information across the region is essential at this period, and for long-term regional cooperation and integration plans like the African Continental Free Trade Area, it is imperative to promote a trustworthy mechanism that ensures protection of citizens civil rights.
This problem underscores a need for comprehensive data governance to support rising digital economy in Africa. If effectively implemented, data governance can address challenges in the areas of privacy, misinformation and alignment of cross-country data regulation to curb cybercrime among other concerns. A report by the Centre for International Governance Innovation reveals that most African countries are yet to enact laws and regulations for digital data protection and security, and for the few countries that have existing data governance structures, these structures are either not fully operational or not up to global standards required to ensure real digital transformation. Effective data governance has therefore become increasingly important at both national and regional levels.
The African Union recently issued a digital transformation strategy for the next ten years (2020 to 2030), which provides policy recommendations for improved data protection to be implemented by member states. Still, a lot more work is required. National data governance frameworks need to define responsibilities and ownership of data assets, specify processes for mitigating data infringement, ensure accountability, integrity, transparency and stewardship, safeguard data privacy and security, protect human-rights and empower citizens to make informed decisions regarding data sharing, discourage unfair practices, while still facilitating free flow of information for innovation and growth of the digital economy. Technologically driven innovations should be encouraged while having regulations that mandate responsible data collection and usage. A policy regime that is thorough, yet flexible, such that it promotes creativity.
Therefore, policy reforms and digital infrastructure investment drive bordering on data governance and digital inclusion are necessary as Africa, and indeed the world gradually readjusts, and recovers from the effects of the pandemic. African countries need to collaborate to ensure all citizens have reliable and secure digital access in order to be competitive in the new economy. Public/private partnerships and investment might be the way forward to ensure inclusion of underserved rural communities. As we embrace international or cross-border integration, data privacy and localization laws are essential. Also, data localization presents a viable tool for governments to exercise control and partake in the value associated with data generated within national borders. Overall, this calls for the right balance in order not to be too restrictive and discourage integration.